Transarterial embolization for Hepatic hemangioma

Indications1. Symptomatic large lesions (> 10 cm), causing pain, potential for complications like rupture, or liver function compromise.
2. Kasabach-Merrit syndrome - rapidly growing vascular tumour, thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and consumptive coagulopathy.
3. Progressive enlargement (>2 cm annual growth)
4. Unresectable lesions with symptoms
5. Patients unfit for surgery
Surgery vs. TAE1. Surgery is no longer the preferred treatment for multiple or extensive lesions
2. TAE avoids general anaesthesia, has shorter hospital stay, and lower morbidity/mortality rates compared to surgery
Choice of Embolization Material (Lipiodol based agents are more effective)1. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles alone (depending on size of feeding vessel 100-300µm, 300-500µm, 500-700µm)
2. Bleomycin with other embolic agents (like PVA and lipiodol) - adding to the sclerosing and embolic effects. Superior to PVA alone. Dose: 30–45 IU Bleomycin mixed with 7–15 ml Lipiodol in a 1:1.5–2 ratio.
3. Pingyangmycin (anti-tumor antibiotic and a vascular sclerosing agent) lipiodol emulsion. Dose: 8–24 mg Pingyangmycin mixed with Lipiodol in 1.5:1 ratio
4. Ethanol
Bleomycin
(Cautious use due to side effects)
1. Associated complications include
- Sclerosing cholangitis
- Interstitial pneumonia
- Pulmonary fibrosis
2. Microcatheters improve precise deposition of embolization particles in small feeding arteries (selective and superselective TAE)
Mechanism of Action1. PVA causes permanent occlusion of hepatic arterioles
2. Lipiodol reduces blood flow temporarily and has tumoricidal activity
Complications1. Post-Embolization Syndrome (PES)
2. Liver or gallbladder infarction
3. Pneumonia
4. Pleural effusion
5. Transient raised LFTs
6. Hemoglobin drop requiring transfusion
Other Management options1. Surgical treatment (hepatic resection or enucleation, open, laproscopic or robotic)
2. Ablative therapies
3. Monoclonal antibody
4. Radiotherapy
5. Chemotherapy
6. Radiation therapy and TAE
7. Liver transplantation

Influence of Blood Supply Type on Interventional Treatment Outcomes in Hepatic Hemangiomas:

AspectRich Blood SupplyModerate Blood SupplyLack of Blood Supply
Thickening of arteriesMild-to-moderateMild No thickening of arteries.
Arterial phaseAbnormal blood sinusoids in the arterial phase.Abnormal blood sinusoids in the arterial phase.Few abnormalities in blood-filled sinuses in the arterial phase.
Dilatation of number of sinusoidal blood-filled spaces in the parenchymal phaseMajority Some1. Few abnormalities noticed in arterial phase.
2. Presence of paranasal sinus tumors in the parenchymal phase.
Treatment Efficacy (within 3 months after embolization)Higher effectiveness rate (e.g., 18.8%) compared to other types Lower effectiveness rate (e.g., 8.7%) Very low effectiveness rate (0%)
Safety rates (within 3 months after embolization)Higher safety rate (e.g., 35.2%) Lower safety rate (e.g., 21.2%) No reported safety rate
EfficacyOptimal short-term efficacy of hepatic artery embolization.Lower short-term efficacy of hepatic artery embolization.Lack of short-term efficacy of hepatic artery embolization.
ComplicationsLower incidence of complications, such as liver function reduction, liver abscess, and biliary tract injury (e.g., 5.4%).Moderate incidence of complications (e.g., 5.7%).Higher incidence of severe complications (e.g., 18.9%).
Fewer complications attributed to chemotherapy drugs and accidental embolization of the biliary ductal system.Moderate risk of complications due to treatment.Increased risk of severe complications due to treatment.
PrognosisFavorable prognosis associated with rich blood supply.Moderate prognosis with moderate blood supply.Poor prognosis associated with a lack of blood supply.
  1. Jia K, Gao Z, Li M, Yu C. Interventional treatments for hepatic hemangioma: A state-of-the-art review. J Interv Med. 2022 Feb 26;5(1):6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2021.12.009. PMID: 35586280; PMCID: PMC8947984.
  2. Jia K, Yin W, Wang F, Gao Z, Han Y, Li M, Yu C. Transarterial embolization for rare spontaneous subacute intratumoral hemorrhage of hepatic hemangioma: a case report and literature review. Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Oct;11(10):3919-3926. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-837. PMID: 36388021; PMCID: PMC9641141.
  3. Srivastava, D., Gandhi, D., Seith, A. et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization in the treatment of symptomatic cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: a prospective study. Abdom Imaging 26, 510–514 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-001-0007-x

  4. Torkian, P., Li, J., Kaufman, J.A. et al. Effectiveness of Transarterial Embolization in Treatment of Symptomatic Hepatic Hemangiomas: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 80–91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02611-5

  5. Bolger K, Choudhary MM, Kouri B. Transarterial chemoembolization as the primary treatment for a super-giant hepatic hemangioma. Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Oct 28;18(1):94-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.09.095. PMID: 36324832; PMCID: PMC9619328.
  6. Firouznia K, Ghanaati H, Alavian SM, Nassiri Toosi M, Ebrahimi Daryani N, Jalali AH, Shakiba M, Hosseinverdi S. Management of liver hemangioma using trans-catheter arterial embolization. Hepat Mon. 2014 Dec 25;14(12):e25788. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.25788. PMID: 25737731; PMCID: PMC4329237.
  7. Crawford D, Naidu S, Patel I, Knuttinen G, Alzubaidi S, Oklu R. Bland Embolization of Benign Liver Tumors: Review of the Literature and a Single Center Experience. J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 9;10(4):658. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040658. PMID: 33572120; PMCID: PMC7915444.
Skip to content