Radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG)
Radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) is a medical procedure that involves the placement of a feeding tube directly into the stomach to provide nutrition to patients who are unable to consume food orally. This method bypasses the mouth and esophagus, allowing for direct feeding into the stomach. While RIG tube insertion is generally considered safe, it can be associated with both minor and major complications. The rate of these complications can vary based on the study population. Despite the potential risks, RIG remains a vital tool in the management of patients with long-term nutritional needs, especially those with underlying comorbidities. Proper care and management of the RIG tube can mitigate many of the associated complications.
Indications for RIG Tube Placement:
Condition/Category | Specific Indications | Key points |
---|---|---|
Neurological Diseases | Cerebrovascular disease, Motor neuron disease (ALS), Multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Cerebral palsy, Dementia, Cerebral tumor | Cerebrovascular disease/stroke - High incidence of dysphagia post-stroke (up to 45%). - NG tube for short-term (<4 weeks) feeding; - PEG superior to NG for long-term nutrition. Motor neuron diseases/ALS - PEG standard for ALS patients. Dementia - High mortality rate post-PEG insertion. Psychomotor retardation - PEG effective for nutrition but not recommended for aspiration and reflux. |
Reduced Consciousness | Head injury, Intensive care patients, Prolonged coma | - Enteral feeding should start early. - PEG nutrition considered if no recovery in 14 days post-severe cerebral injury. |
Congenital anomalies | Trachea esophageal fistula | |
Cancer | Head and neck cancer, Esophageal cancer | - Over 40% with head and neck malignancy are malnourished. - PEG can be prophylactic or therapeutic. |
Miscellaneous | Burns, Fistulae, Cystic fibrosis, Facial surgery, Chronic renal failure, HIV/AIDS, Gastric decompression, Abdominal malignancy | Gastric decompression - PEG used for chronic unresolved GI stenosis or ileus. HIV/AIDS - PEG improves weight and nutritional markers in wasting syndrome. Cystic fibrosis - Better nutrition linked to better survival. - PEG improves nutritional and pulmonary status. Crohn’s disease - Enteral nutrition reduces steroid requirements. - PEG safety demonstrated, but rarely used due to other nutritional alternatives. |
Contraindications for RIG Tube Placement:
Absolute Contraindications | Relative Contraindications |
---|---|
Serious coagulation disorders | Non-obstructing oropharyngeal/esophageal malignancy |
Hemodynamic instability | Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly |
Sepsis | Peritoneal dialysis |
Peritonitis | Portal hypertension with gastric varices |
Abdominal wall infection | History of partial gastrectomy |
Marked peritoneal carcinomatosis | Gastric outlet obstruction (if for feeding) |
History of total gastrectomy | Severe gastroparesis (if for feeding) |
Lack of informed consent for the procedure | |
Severe ascites |
Complications of RIG tube placement:
Complication Type | Description | Frequency | Management | Key Points |
---|---|---|---|---|
MAJOR COMPLICATIONS | ||||
Bleeding | Bleeding from PEG tract, gastric artery, splenic or mesenteric vein injuries, rectus sheath hematoma | Rare | Fluid support, pressure over wound, endoscopic/surgical exploration | Correct coagulation disorders before PEG insertion |
Aspiration pneumonia | Serious complication of PEG tube feeding | Common in high-risk | Monitor feeding volume and position | Jejunal extension for high-risk patients, but associated with more tube dysfunction and dislocation rates |
Internal organ injury | Injury to intra-abdominal organs (liver, spleen, colon, small bowel) during PEG placement | Rare (more common in elderly patients due to laxity of colon mesentry) | CT scan with water-soluble contrast or fluoroscopy to confirm the location Surgical management maybe required for active leak. | Watchful follow-up after PEG insertion |
Necrotizing fasciitis | Rapidly spreading infection along fascial planes | Very rare | Immediate surgical debridement, antibiotics, intensive care | Keep external bumper 1-2 cm away from abdominal wall |
Buried bumper syndrome | Migration of tube toward abdominal wall | Occurs post 3 weeks | Remove tube immediately | Occurs due to excessive tension between internal and external bumper leading to ischemic necrosis. Keep external bumper 1-2 cm away from abdominal wall |
Tumour seeding of the stoma | Rare complication in patients with head and neck cancer | Rare | Biopsy and CT scan | Avoid "pull" or "push" method in oropharyngeal cancer patients |
MINOR COMPLICATIONS | ||||
Granuloma formation | Hyper-granulation tissue around the gastrostomy tube | Common | Various treatments available (topical antimicrobial agent, low dose steroids), none proven superior | Caused by friction and moisture |
Local wound infection | Tube site infection | 5%-65% (Most common complication) | Local antiseptics, daily dressing changes, systemic/local antibiotics | Prophylactic antibiotics beneficial - single dose of cephalosporins 1 hour prior to procedure. |
Periostomal leakage | Leakage around PEG site | Common in certain groups | Address specific causes, allow tract to close if mature, reinsert in new location | Avoid inserting larger tube Can leak into peritoneum causing peritonitis |
Tube dislodgment | Tube slides in or out of gastrointestinal tract | Up to 12.8% | Replace through same tract if mature | Maintain external bumper 1-2 cm from skin |
Gastric outlet obstruction | PEG tube migration to pyloric area, causing obstruction | Rare | Reposition tube | Keep external bumper 1-2 cm from skin |
Pneumoperitoneum | Common post-PEG insertion | Up to 50% | Continue PEG feeding unless peritoneal signs | Consider bowel injury if persists after 72h |
- Rahnemai-Azar, Ata A et al. “Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management.” World journal of gastroenterology vol. 20,24 (2014): 7739-51. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739
- Brown A, Mueller P, Ferrucci J. Controlled Percutaneous Gastrostomy: Nylon T-Fastener for Fixation of the Anterior Gastric Wall. Radiology. 1986;158(2):543-5. doi:10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934763 – Pubmed
- de Baere T, Chapot R, Kuoch V et al. Percutaneous Gastrostomy with Fluoroscopic Guidance: Single-Center Experience in 500 Consecutive Cancer Patients. Radiology. 1999;210(3):651-4. doi:10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr40651 – Pubmed
- Hoffer E, Cosgrove J, Levin D, Herskowitz M, Sclafani S. Radiologic Gastrojejunostomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(4):413-20. doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70058-8 – Pubmed