Portal Vein Tumoral Thrombosis (PVTT) and management

We present a comprehensive overview of various diagnostic methods for PVTT detection, such as ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, CT scans, MRI, and PET/CT, each offering unique insights into the extent and nature of the disease. Our focus then shifts to the nuanced world of TACE treatment, examining its efficacy across different PVTT stages as classified by Ikai et al. (LCSGJ) and other systems. We provide detailed tables summarizing key studies, highlighting patient cohorts, PVTT classifications, median survival times, and survival rates across different years. These tables offer valuable insights into the variable outcomes of TACE based on the PVTT stage and underline the potential benefits of combining TACE with other treatments.

Portal vein tumor thrombus classification:

Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ)
DescriptionCheng et al
Description
--Type I0Microscopic portal vein invasion
Vp1Presence of a tumor thrombus distal to the second-order branches of the portal veinType Isimillar to Vp1 and Vp2
Vp2Invasion of the second-order branches of the portal vein
Vp3Presence of the thrombus in the first-order branchesType IIsimillar to Vp3
Vp4Tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein and/or a portal vein branch contralateral to the primarily involved lobeType IIIsimillar to Vp4
--Type IVinvolvement of superior mesenteric vein
Vv1Tumor thrombus in a branch of the hepatic vein--
Vv2Tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the hepatic veins--
Vv3Thrombus reaching the right atrium--

Diagnostic Methods for PVTT in HCC:

Diagnostic MethodSensitivitySpecificityNotable Features
Ultrasound (US)80%-100%-Detects hypo/isoechoic thrombus, arterial neovascularization
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)88%-100%94%-96%Distinguishes neoplastic from benign PVT; rapid wash-in and wash-out phases
CT-Scan86%100%Identifies thrombosis extension, collateral vessels
MRI100%90%Differentiates neoplastic/non-neoplastic thrombosis
PET/CT--Identifies metabolic abnormalities before morphological changes

Treatment Modalities for PVTT in HCC:

Treatment MethodEfficacy1-Year Survival Rate (%)Adverse EffectsAdditional Notes
TACEVaries by PVTT typeUp to 29Higher AE in TACE than conservative treatmentEffectiveness related to hepatic arterial supply to the thrombus
SorafenibLimited in advanced HCC-Dermatological, GI, constitutional AEsMulti-tyrosine-kinase inhibitor; efficacy investigated in SHARP and Asia-Pacific Trials
SurgerySuperior to TACE in BCLC-B/CUp to 62-Hepatectomy, tumor thrombectomy, en-bloc resection
RTEffective in selected patientsUp to 51.6Risk of severe liver damage, RILDSDose-related response; effectiveness in downstaging
Percutaneous AblationEffective in certain conditions-Risk of damaging nearby structuresIncludes RFA, cryotherapy, ECT; limited by extension/location of PVTT
Liver TransplantationContraindicated in HCC with PVTT-High risk of tumor recurrenceLiving-donor LT after successful downstaging considered in some cases

Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for PVTT in HCC:

Treatment ComparisonStudy ReferenceFindingsSurvival RatesNotes
TACE vs ConservativeXue et al, Leng et alTACE shows better survival rates6-mo and 1-year survival better in TACE group-
Surgery vs TACEHyun et alSurgery shows significant OS benefit in BCLC-B/C1-, 3-, 5-years survival higher for hepatectomyHR = 0.59; 95%CI: 0.51-0.67
Sorafenib vs PlaceboSHARP Trial, Asia-Pacific TrialSlight prolongation of OS with sorafenib-More effective in Western population (SHARP) than in Asia-Pacific
TACE + Sorafenib vs Sorafenib AloneVarious StudiesMixed results, some benefit in combination treatment-Combination may improve TTP but not OS

Summary of Studies on TACE Efficacy in PVTT in HCC:

Study (First Author, Year)Patient Cohort (n)PVTT Class (Vp)Median Survival TimeSurvival Rates (1-yr, 2-yr, 3-yr, 5-yr)
Okazaki M, 1991163Vp2 (48), Vp3 (56), Vp4 (59)4.3, 4, 3.8 months-
Chung JW, 199583Vp3, Vp4 (83)6 months30%, 18%, 9%, -
Georgiades CS, 200532Vp3, Vp4 (32)9.5 months25%, -, -, -
Luo J, 201184Vp1,2 (40), Vp3 (44)10.2, 5.3 months30.9%, 3.8%; 9.2%, 0%; -, -
Niu ZJ, 2012115Vp1 (12), Vp2 (52), Vp3 (42), Vp4 (9)19, 11, 7.1, 4 months27.8%, 6%, -, -
Peng ZW, 2012402Vp1 (54), Vp2 (136), Vp3 (166), Vp4 (46)-41.1%, 37.9%, 36.1%, 30.4%; -, 8.9%, 6%, 4.2%, 4.3%; 3.6%, 0%, 0%, 0%
Ajit Y, 2014--6.2 months-, 22%, -, -
Liu L, 2014188Vp1,2 (98), Vp3 (90)6 months38%, 17%, 3%, -
Liu PH, 2014181Vp1,2 (181)-60%, -, 42%, 33%
Chern MC, 201450Vp1,2,3,46.2 months (range 1.7–50.9 months)22%, 10%, 8%, -
Tawada A, 201481Vp1,2,3,4NA45%, 23%, 20%, -
Ye JZ, 2014338Vp1,2,3,4 (86 patients TACE)7.0 months17.5%, 0%, 0%, -
Tan X, 2015116Type I, II, III (according to Shi et al)27.7 months (TACE+PVE)60.9%, 80.7%; 41%, 59%; 25%, 36.5%; 0%, 11.5% (TACE vs TACE+PVE)
  1. Cerrito L, Annicchiarico BE, Iezzi R, Gasbarrini A, Pompili M, Ponziani FR. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(31): 4360-4382 [PMID: 31496618 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4360]
  2. Xue TC, Xie XY, Zhang L, Yin X, Zhang BH, Ren ZG. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr 8;13:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-60. PMID: 23566041; PMCID: PMC3626696.
  3. Leng JJ, Xu YZ, Dong JH. Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Oct;86(10):816-820. doi: 10.1111/ans.12803. Epub 2014 Aug 3. PMID: 25088384.
  4. Hyun MH, Lee YS, Kim JH, Lee CU, Jung YK, Seo YS, Yim HJ, Yeon JE, Byun KS. Hepatic resection compared to chemoembolization in intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):977-993. doi: 10.1002/hep.29883. Epub 2018 May 21. PMID: 29543988.
  5. Bruix J, Raoul JL, Sherman M, Mazzaferro V, Bolondi L, Craxi A, Galle PR, Santoro A, Beaugrand M, Sangiovanni A, Porta C, Gerken G, Marrero JA, Nadel A, Shan M, Moscovici M, Voliotis D, Llovet JM. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2012 Oct;57(4):821-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jun 19. PMID: 22727733.
  6. Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16. PMID: 19095497.
  7. Okada S, Okazaki N, Nose H, Yoshimori M, Aoki K. Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving systemic chemotherapy. Hepatology. 1992 Jul;16(1):112-7. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840160119. PMID: 1377657.
  8. Niu ZJ, Ma YL, Kang P, Ou SQ, Meng ZB, Li ZK, Qi F, Zhao C. Transarterial chemoembolization compared with conservative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: using a new classification. Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(4):2992-7. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0145-0. Epub 2011 Dec 27. PMID: 22200992.
  9. Peng ZW, Guo RP, Zhang YJ, Lin XJ, Chen MS, Lau WY. Hepatic resection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Cancer. 2012 Oct 1;118(19):4725-36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26561. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PMID: 22359112.
  10. Ajit Y, Sudarsan H, Saumya G, Abhishek A, Navneet R, Piyush R, Anil A, Arun G. Transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: a perspective on survival. Oman Med J. 2014 Nov;29(6):430-6. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.114. PMID: 25584161; PMCID: PMC4289489.
  11. Liu L, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Qi X, Chen H, Bai W, He C, Guo W, Yin Z, Fan D, Han G. Transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: prognostic factors in a single-center study of 188 patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:194278. doi: 10.1155/2014/194278. Epub 2014 Apr 8. PMID: 24800212; PMCID: PMC3996986.
  12. Liu PH, Lee YH, Hsia CY, Hsu CY, Huang YH, Chiou YY, Lin HC, Huo TI. Surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):1825-33. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3510-3. Epub 2014 Feb 6. PMID: 24499831.
  13. Tawada A, Chiba T, Ooka Y, Kanogawa N, Motoyama T, Saito T, Ogasawara S, Suzuki E, Maruyama H, Kanai F, Yoshikawa M, Yokosuka O. Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization targeting portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2014 Aug;34(8):4231-7. PMID: 25075052.
  14. Ye JZ, Wang YY, Bai T, Chen J, Xiang BD, Wu FX, Li LQ. Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in the Asia-Pacific region beyond the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer treatment algorithms: a review and update. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(54):93258-93278. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18735. PMID: 29190996; PMCID: PMC5696262.
Skip to content